J Med Assoc Thai 2021; 104 (2):286-92

Views: 914 | Downloads: 40 | Responses: 0

PDF XML Respond to this article Print Alert & updates Request permissions Email to a friend


The Perioperative and Anesthetic Adverse Events in Thailand (PAAd Thai) Study of Anesthetic Equipment Malfunction or Failure: An Analysis of 2,206 Incident Reports
Ratanasuwan P , Sriraj W Mail, Punjasawadwong Y , Choorat J , Charuluxananan S , Pravitharangul T

Background: Anesthesia equipment problems may contribute to anesthesia mortality and morbidity. The Royal College of Anesthesiologists of Thailand initiated a multicentered incident reporting study namely the Perioperative and Anesthetic Adverse Events in Thailand (PAAd Thai) Study to investigate perioperative complications including equipment malfunction or failure.

Materials and Methods: The present report was a descriptive prospective study. After the Institutional Ethical approval with informed consent was waived, the case record form comprising structured and narrative information parts was requested to be filled within 24 hours of occurrence of anesthesia equipment malfunction or failure in 22 large government hospitals across Thailand between January and December 2015. Three senior anesthesiologists reviewed the incident reports. Any discrepancy was discussed to achieve a consensus. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis.

Results: Out of 2,206 incident reports, there were 47 (2.1%) equipment malfunction or failure involving anesthetic machine (36.0%), anesthetic circuit (27.6%), laryngoscope (17.0%) and monitoring (12.7%) in operating theatre (97.8%), pediatric anesthesia (19.1%), and emergency condition (21.2%). Diagnoses of incidents was either clinical detection (82.9%) or detection by monitoring equipment (48.9%). Outcomes of incidents were trivial with full recovery. The incidents were considered as results from human factor (38.3%), preventable (46.8%), and might be prevented with surgical safety checklists (34.0%).

Conclusion: Equipment malfunction or failure incidents were unusual and did not lead to serious consequence. Common contributing factors were ineffective equipment, non-adherence to surgical checklists, haste, and inexperience of performers. Factors to minimize the incidents were equipment checking, having experience, and comply to surgical checklists. Quality assurance activity, standard and regular equipment maintenance, adherence to surgical checklists, and additional training were suggested as corrective measures.

Keywords: Anesthesia, Complications, Equipment malfunction, Equipment failure, Human factors, Surgical checklist

DOI: doi.org/10.35755/jmedassocthai.2021.02.11786

Received 17 August 2020 | Revised 12 October 2020 | Accepted 12 October 2020


Download: PDF