Views: 1,531 | Downloads:
172
| Responses: 0
| XML | Respond to this article | Alert & updates | Request permissions | Email to a friend |
Original ArticleOpen Access
A Method Comparison Study of Flow Cytometry and Cytomorphology to Determine the Percentages of Blasts in Patients with Acute Leukemia after Induction and Consolidation Chemotherapy
Wongprajun S 
,
U Auewarakul C
,
U Auewarakul C Background: Enumeration of blasts in the bone marrow is an essential component in the diagnosis and treatment of acute
leukemia. The current gold standard method is based on a morphologic counting of 500 marrow nucleated cells despite its
operator dependence and inter-observer variability.
Objectives: To compare the percentages of marrow blasts derived from two different approaches comprising routine morphologybased
manual counting and flow cytometric analysis.
Material and Method: Fifty-five marrow samples were collected from 38 acute leukemia patients (36 AML and 19 ALL) after
hematologic recovery from chemotherapy. The blast percentages were enumerated manually and by flow cytometer using
CD45 and side scatter gates.
Results: A good correlation was found in the overall 55 samples (r = 0.829) and 36 AML samples (r = 0.86). The blast
percentages derived from flow cytometer were higher than from morphologic counting in 46 samples (83.6%). Using a cutoff
point of < 5% blasts to define complete remission (CR), 48 cases (87%) were classified as morphological CR (83% CR in
AML and 95% CR in ALL). By flow cytometry, only 24 cases (44%) were in CR (28% CR in AML and 74% CR in ALL). The
results from each method were concordant in determining CR in 27 samples (49%), with a kappa value of 0.07 for overall
samples, 0.057 for AML and -0.096 for ALL samples.
Conclusion: A good correlation between the percentages of blasts achieved by either method was demonstrated, particularly
in AML samples. Discordant results occurred when <5% blasts were used as a cut-off point to determine CR. Both methods
should be complementarily performed to ensure a truly complete response to chemotherapy. The method discrepancy should
be further investigated in order to increase the level of confidence in CR status.
Keywords: acute leukemia, flow cytometry, cytomorphology, blast counts, bone marrow, complete remission
leukemia. The current gold standard method is based on a morphologic counting of 500 marrow nucleated cells despite its
operator dependence and inter-observer variability.
Objectives: To compare the percentages of marrow blasts derived from two different approaches comprising routine morphologybased
manual counting and flow cytometric analysis.
Material and Method: Fifty-five marrow samples were collected from 38 acute leukemia patients (36 AML and 19 ALL) after
hematologic recovery from chemotherapy. The blast percentages were enumerated manually and by flow cytometer using
CD45 and side scatter gates.
Results: A good correlation was found in the overall 55 samples (r = 0.829) and 36 AML samples (r = 0.86). The blast
percentages derived from flow cytometer were higher than from morphologic counting in 46 samples (83.6%). Using a cutoff
point of < 5% blasts to define complete remission (CR), 48 cases (87%) were classified as morphological CR (83% CR in
AML and 95% CR in ALL). By flow cytometry, only 24 cases (44%) were in CR (28% CR in AML and 74% CR in ALL). The
results from each method were concordant in determining CR in 27 samples (49%), with a kappa value of 0.07 for overall
samples, 0.057 for AML and -0.096 for ALL samples.
Conclusion: A good correlation between the percentages of blasts achieved by either method was demonstrated, particularly
in AML samples. Discordant results occurred when <5% blasts were used as a cut-off point to determine CR. Both methods
should be complementarily performed to ensure a truly complete response to chemotherapy. The method discrepancy should
be further investigated in order to increase the level of confidence in CR status.
Keywords: acute leukemia, flow cytometry, cytomorphology, blast counts, bone marrow, complete remission
Download:
PDF