Views: 1,509 | Downloads:
323
| Responses: 0
| XML | Respond to this article | Alert & updates | Request permissions | Email to a friend |
Original ArticleOpen Access
Health Promotion Behaviors and Related Factors in End Stage Renal Disease Patients Treated with Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis
Wechpradit A 
,
Thaiyuenwong J ,
Kanjanabuch T
,
Thaiyuenwong J ,
Kanjanabuch T Objective: To present study health promotion behaviors and related factors in end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients treated
with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD).
Material and Method: Questionnaires of Pender to evaluate health promotion behaviors which measure 5 aspects of healthaffected
behaviors were examined in 90 CAPD patients at dialysis unit of Udornthani Hospital. Results were categorized into
3 groups according to Bloom’s scale as follows: high, moderate, and low levels. The data were displayed as ranges or means
+ standard deviation, according to the characteristics of each variable, with a 5% (p < 0.05) significant level. For nonparametric
variables, comparisons were conducted by using the Chi-square and Fisher exact tests. Pearson correlation test
was utilized for statistical analysis where appropriate.
Results: Three fourths of the participants had high overall and individual rating of health promotion behaviors, including
health responsibility, interpersonal relationship, spiritual improvement, and stress management behaviors. However, the
behaviors related to personal activities and nutrition fell into moderate category. Of interest, none of patients had low overall
rating. To assess influence factors on health promotion behaviors, only perception of health care promotion usefulness,
perception of health care promotion obstacle, perception of themselves, and social support were related to the health
promotion behaviors (r = 0.35, 0.34, 0.44, and 0.45, respectively; individual p-value was less than 0.01). Caregiver also
influenced with lower degree correlation compared to the above factors. Neither demographics nor patient characteristics
affected the behaviors.
Conclusion: The results encourage efforts to monitor and detect health behaviors that might impair compliance with PD
system. The center should find tailor-made strategy with assistance and supports by local community and family member to
continuously promote and cherish health behaviors of the patients.
Keywords: Health promotion behaviors, End stage renal disease, Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD), Stress
management behaviors
with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD).
Material and Method: Questionnaires of Pender to evaluate health promotion behaviors which measure 5 aspects of healthaffected
behaviors were examined in 90 CAPD patients at dialysis unit of Udornthani Hospital. Results were categorized into
3 groups according to Bloom’s scale as follows: high, moderate, and low levels. The data were displayed as ranges or means
+ standard deviation, according to the characteristics of each variable, with a 5% (p < 0.05) significant level. For nonparametric
variables, comparisons were conducted by using the Chi-square and Fisher exact tests. Pearson correlation test
was utilized for statistical analysis where appropriate.
Results: Three fourths of the participants had high overall and individual rating of health promotion behaviors, including
health responsibility, interpersonal relationship, spiritual improvement, and stress management behaviors. However, the
behaviors related to personal activities and nutrition fell into moderate category. Of interest, none of patients had low overall
rating. To assess influence factors on health promotion behaviors, only perception of health care promotion usefulness,
perception of health care promotion obstacle, perception of themselves, and social support were related to the health
promotion behaviors (r = 0.35, 0.34, 0.44, and 0.45, respectively; individual p-value was less than 0.01). Caregiver also
influenced with lower degree correlation compared to the above factors. Neither demographics nor patient characteristics
affected the behaviors.
Conclusion: The results encourage efforts to monitor and detect health behaviors that might impair compliance with PD
system. The center should find tailor-made strategy with assistance and supports by local community and family member to
continuously promote and cherish health behaviors of the patients.
Keywords: Health promotion behaviors, End stage renal disease, Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD), Stress
management behaviors
Download:
PDF