Views: 1,465 | Downloads:
206
| Responses: 0
| XML | Respond to this article | Alert & updates | Request permissions | Email to a friend |
Original ArticleOpen Access
Establishment the Cost-Effectiveness through Set Criteria of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Ruangsin S 
,
Jaroonrach V ,
Petpichetchian C ,
Puttawibul P ,
Sunpaweravong S ,
Chewatanagongun S
,
Jaroonrach V ,
Petpichetchian C ,
Puttawibul P ,
Sunpaweravong S ,
Chewatanagongun S Objective: To assess the set criteria of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in reducing the length of hospital stay (LOHS), and
total treatment expenditure.
Material and Method: The measurement outcomes were prospectively analyzed through the medical record, and self
questionnaire of the patients.
Results: During the 1-year trial, a total of 122 patients were scheduled for LC. Among these, 85 cases had met the set criteria
of low risk clients of; both preoperative indicator of a) American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class 1 or 2, and
postoperative indicators of b) no surgical drainage, and c) no immediate complication, while 37 cases were excluded due to
ASA class 3 or 4, and various reasons. Distributed by the duration of hospital stay, the patients were classified in to three
groups; group A was overnight hospital stay, 15 of 85 subjects (17.6%), group B was short hospital stay (within 3 days), 51
of 85 subjects (60.0%), and group C was long hospital stay (more than 3 days), 19 of 85 subjects (22.4%). The mean length
of hospital stay (LOHS) was 24 + 1.61 hours in group A, 55 + 11.16 in group B, and 108 + 21.59 in group C, while the
average total expenditure was 531.22 + 111.09, 665.5 + 133.35 and 812.33 + 158.62, respectively. For the overnight hospital
stay group, the LOHS and the total treatment expenditure was significantly lower the other groups (p < 0.001). The majority
of the overnight hospital stay group had rated the patient satisfaction as excellent.
Conclusion: The set criteria of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) are helpful and establish the cost-effectiveness in terms of
reduction of LOHS and total treatment expenditure.
Keywords: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Set criteria, Length of hospital stay
total treatment expenditure.
Material and Method: The measurement outcomes were prospectively analyzed through the medical record, and self
questionnaire of the patients.
Results: During the 1-year trial, a total of 122 patients were scheduled for LC. Among these, 85 cases had met the set criteria
of low risk clients of; both preoperative indicator of a) American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class 1 or 2, and
postoperative indicators of b) no surgical drainage, and c) no immediate complication, while 37 cases were excluded due to
ASA class 3 or 4, and various reasons. Distributed by the duration of hospital stay, the patients were classified in to three
groups; group A was overnight hospital stay, 15 of 85 subjects (17.6%), group B was short hospital stay (within 3 days), 51
of 85 subjects (60.0%), and group C was long hospital stay (more than 3 days), 19 of 85 subjects (22.4%). The mean length
of hospital stay (LOHS) was 24 + 1.61 hours in group A, 55 + 11.16 in group B, and 108 + 21.59 in group C, while the
average total expenditure was 531.22 + 111.09, 665.5 + 133.35 and 812.33 + 158.62, respectively. For the overnight hospital
stay group, the LOHS and the total treatment expenditure was significantly lower the other groups (p < 0.001). The majority
of the overnight hospital stay group had rated the patient satisfaction as excellent.
Conclusion: The set criteria of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) are helpful and establish the cost-effectiveness in terms of
reduction of LOHS and total treatment expenditure.
Keywords: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Set criteria, Length of hospital stay
Download:
PDF