J Med Assoc Thai 2000; 83 (1):13

Views: 1,367 | Downloads: 34 | Responses: 0

PDF XML Respond to this article Print Alert & updates Request permissions Email to a friend


Abdominopelvic Vascular Injuries
Sriussadaporn S Mail

The clinical records of 25 patients with 32 abdominopelvic vascular injuries were
reviewed. Sixty per cent of patients sustained blunt trauma and 40 per cent sustained penetrating
trauma. Nineteen patients (76%) were in shock on arrival, 2 of them underwent ER thoraco-
tomy when they first arrived in the emergency room. Nine patients (36%) had signs of lower
extremity ischemia. The Injury Severity Score (ISS) ranged from 16 -50, mean 29
เธ‘
10.0. Nineteen
patients (76%) had 35 associated injuries. Of the 32 injured vessels; 8 were external iliac artery,
5 were renal vein, 4 were abdominal aorta, 3 were common iliac artery, common iliac vein,
external iliac vein and inferior vena cava, and 1 was superior mesenteric artery, superior mesen-
teric vein and median sacral artery. Treatments included: 13 lateral repair, 4 prosthetic grafting,
4 nephrectomy, 3 ligation, 3 reversed saphenous vein grafting, 2 end to end anastomosis, I
internal iliac artery grafting, 1 intravascular shunt and packing and 1 perihepatic packing. Nine
patients (36%) died. High mortality was observed in injuries to the abdominal aorta (75%),
inferior vena cava (66.7%), common iliac vein (66.7%) and associated major pelvic fractures
(50%). Factors significantly associated with mortality were the presence of shock on arrival,
associated injuries and high Injury Severity Score. The author concludes that short prehos-
pital time, effective resuscitation and proper surgical decision making are important for survival
in these critically injured patients.
Key word : Abdominopelvic Vascular Injuries

Download: PDF