J Med Assoc Thai 2001; 84 (12):1701

Views: 1,307 | Downloads: 26 | Responses: 0

PDF XML Respond to this article Print Alert & updates Request permissions Email to a friend


Effectiveness of Clopidogrel and Aspirin Versus Ticlopidine and Aspirin After Coronary Stent Implantation: 1 and 6-month Follow-up
Piamsomboon C Mail, Laorhavom P , Chatlaong B , Saguanwong S , Nasawadi C , Tanprasert P , Leelaprure M , Inrayakorn U , Amomsak N

PRASART LAOTHA VORN,M.D. *,
SOPON SAGUANWONG, M.D.*,
PRAVIT TANPRASERT, M.D.*,
UNCHALEE INTAYAKORN, B.Sc.*,
Background : Clopidogrel is a new thienopyridine derivative and has less serious hemato-
logic complications. We investigated the efficacy of clopidogrel plus aspirin (CA) in stent throm-
bosis prevention compared with ticlopidine plus aspirin (TA).
Method and Results : Sixty-eight patients who underwent coronary stenting were ran-
domized into 2 groups: TA group, n
=
31 and CA group, n
=
37. At 1 month, there were 3 major
bleeding complications, 2 in the CA group and 1 in the TA group. Neither stent thrombosis nor
hematologic events were found in both groups. Two patients in the T A group died, 1 from sudden
death and another from tracheal stenosis. At 6 months, five patients developed in-stent restenosis,
4 in the CA group and 1 in the TA group, p
=
NS. One patient in each group had acute coronary
syndrome.
Conclusion : Clopidogrel plus aspirin is an effective coronary stenting regimen compa-
rable to ticlopidine plus aspirin.
Key word : Clopidogrel, Coronary, Stent

Download: PDF