J Med Assoc Thai 2003; 86 (7):666

Views: 1,441 | Downloads: 23 | Responses: 0

PDF XML Respond to this article Print Alert & updates Request permissions Email to a friend


Mouse Blastocyst Vitrification Compared with the Conventional Slow- Freezing Method
MD WT Mail, Pruksananonda K , Boonyakasemsanti W , Virutamasen P , Ahnonkitpanit V , Chompurat D , Numchaisrika P

SOMCHAI SUWAJANAKORN, MD*,
KUMTHORN PRUKSANANONDA, MD*,
PRAMUAN VIRUTAMASEN, MD*,
DOENTIP CHOMPURAT, BSc*,
To compare mouse blastocyst survival after cryopreservation with vitrification and the slow-
freezing method, one-hundred and forty-eight
in vitro
mouse blastocysts were randomly frozen by the
two methods: vitrification and conventional slow-freezing. After being thawed, the blastocysts were
assessed for survival and hatching rate. The survival rates of blastocysts cryopreserved by vitrifica-
tion and slow-freezing were 68.33 and 65.52 per cent (p
=
0.89), whereas hatching rates were 51.22 and
44.74 per cent, respectively (p
=
0.64).Therefore, vitrification of blastocyst-stage-embryos may be a
useful, economic method for freezing the excess blastocysts in some centers where blastocysts are
routinely transferred.
Key word
: Mouse Blastocyst, Cryopreservation, Vitrification, Conventional, Slow-Freezing Method

Download: PDF