J Med Assoc Thai 2007; 90 (5):837

Views: 1,546 | Downloads: 31 | Responses: 0

PDF XML Respond to this article Print Alert & updates Request permissions Email to a friend


A Comparative Study between Laparoscopically Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy and Abdominal Hysterectomy
Jaturasrivilai P Mail

Objective: To compare efficiency of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) and total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH)
Material and Method: Medical records of 50 cases of LAVH and 50 cases of TAH were reviewed from January 2004 to December 2004
Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups in basic clinical characteristics. Myoma uteri was the major cause of operation. The operative time (115.9 + 40.8 min vs. 68.2 +14.2 min), the operative cost (26,763.48 + 2,718.37 Baht vs. 22,345.50 + 4,057.40 Baht), diclofenac for postoperative analgesics (135.0 + 67.5 mg vs. 300.0 + 75.0 mg), the postoperative hospital stay (2.6 + 0.9 days vs. 4.5 + 1.1 days), and the time to return to work (30.4 + 3.1 days vs. 50.9 + 6.6 days) were significantly different in the LAVH group compared to the TAH group. There was no significant difference in blood loss between the two groups. The mean score of recovery scale for LAVH was 9 and 7 for TAH at the 28th day of post-op. There was one bladder injury in the LAVH group. The common complications in both groups were hemorrhage and febrile morbidity. The learning curve of LAVH procedure showed that operative time was significantly different between the 30th and 40th cases (122.0 + 31.8 min vs. 91.0 + 26.5 min). Doing LAVH with condition of uterine weight will not effect the operative time and blood loss.
Conclusion: LAVH is less painful, has a shorter length of hospital stay and quicker return to work than TAH. Moreover, LAVH does not increase intra- or postoperative complications. LAVH is another alternative choice to treat myoma uteri in a well trained operator.

Keywords: LAVH, TAH


Download: PDF