* International Health Policy Program, Bureau of Policy and Strategy, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi
Affiliation : Sripen Tantivess PhD*
The processes of policy development and implementation in the public sector are complex and dynamic as several actors with different interests are involved. To pursue their benefits, these individual and organizational participants compete with each other, and those with a relatively high degree of power can lead the policy decisions. Results of and recommendations derived from economic evaluation and other forms of health technology assessment (HTA) are expected to have an important role in policy making and professional practice. However, it appears that on many occasions, such scientific evidence is neglected. Complex calculations, arbitrary assumptions, debatable choices of whose perspectives to pursue, difficult-to-understand methods, research designs and underlying philosophy/concepts, and time-consuming processes are claimed as key factors discouraging policy makers and practitioners from making use of HTA findings. Ethical considerations and the perception that HTA-based clinical guidelines undermine professional autonomy are also crucial.
Keywords : Public policy, Policy process, Health technology assessment, Economic evaluation, Priority setting, Evidence-based medicine, Ethics
JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION OF THAILAND
4th Floor, Royal Golden Jubilee Building,
2 Soi Soonvijai, New Petchburi road,
Bangkok 10310, Thailand.
Phone: 0-2716-6102, 0-2716-6962
Fax: 0-2314-6305
Email: editor@jmatonline.com
» Online Submissions » Author Guidelines » Copyright Notice » Privacy Statement
» Journal Sponsorship » Site Map » About this Publishing System
© MEDICAL ASSOCIATION OF THAILAND. All Rights Reserved. The content of this site is intended for health professionals.