Pakkapon Rattanachaisit, MD1,2, Piyapan Prueksapanich, MD1, Roongruedee Chaiteerakij, MD, PhD1, Piyawat Komolmit, MD, PhD1, Sombat Treeprasertsuk, MD, PhD1
Affiliation : 1 Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand. 2 Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
Background : Combined pharmacological and endoscopic therapy, particularly endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL), is the first-line
treatment for acute esophageal variceal bleeding (EVB). In patients with rebleeding, the rescue treatment with a transjugular
intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is recommended. However, in a real world setting where the accessibility to TIPS is
limited, repeated endoscopic therapy is inevitably performed.
Objective : To study the outcomes of EVL on rebleeding and mortality in the resource-limited setting.
Materials and Methods : Patients who underwent EVL during 2017 to 2018 are included. Patients were treated with vasoactive
drugs and EVL until the eradication of varices. We focus on the outcome of a second attempt at EVL to control EVB. The rebleeding
and mortality rate within 6 months after the combined treatment were collected. Logistic regression analysis was performed to
identify risk factors of rebleeding.
Results : There were 339 EVL performed during the 2-year period. Of these procedures, EVL was indicated to control acute EVB
in 118 patients. EVB in 98 patients (83%) were successfully controlled in only one session of EVL, while those of 20 patients (17%)
required at least 2 sessions to control the recurrent EVB. In the rebleeding group, no patient rebled within 5 days after the first
EVL, while 15 patients (75%) rebled within 6 weeks. Once rebled, the second EVL was performed. There were 5 patients (25%)
whom the second EVL failed to control the recurrent EVB. Those recurrent EVB were finally controlled by the other endoscopic
therapy. The 6-week mortality after rebleeding was 15%. Hepatocellular carcinoma and creatinine are factors associated with
recurrent EVB within 6 weeks with odds ratio (OR) 5.96 (95% CI 1.41 to 25.19, p = 0.02) and OR 1.47 (95% CI: 1.02 to 2.11, p = 0.04),
respectively.
Conclusion : The second attempt at endoscopic therapy can be considered to control recurrent EVB after the first EVL with a
success rate of 75% in area where an accessibility to a treatment with TIPS is limited.
DOI: 10.35755/jmedassocthai.2020.S08.12103
Keywords : Endoscopic therapy, Outcomes, Real world, Recurrent, Variceal bleeding
JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION OF THAILAND
4th Floor, Royal Golden Jubilee Building,
2 Soi Soonvijai, New Petchburi road,
Bangkok 10310, Thailand.
Phone: 0-2716-6102, 0-2716-6962
Fax: 0-2314-6305
Email: editor@jmatonline.com
» Online Submissions » Author Guidelines » Copyright Notice » Privacy Statement
» Journal Sponsorship » Site Map » About this Publishing System
© MEDICAL ASSOCIATION OF THAILAND. All Rights Reserved. The content of this site is intended for health professionals.