Phutsapong Srisawat MD*, Puwadol Veeraphun MD*, Thipachart Punyaratabandhu MD*, Supichai Chareonvareekul MD*, Thawee Songpattanasilpa MD, PhD*, Pipat Sritanabutr MD**, Sahachart Pipithkul MD*
Affiliation : * Musculoskeletal Oncology Unit, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Phramongkutklao Hospital & College of Medicine, Bangkok, Thailand ** Department of Pathology, Phramongkutklao Hospital & College of Medicine, Bangkok, Thailand
Background : The biopsy is a simple but critical step in the diagnosis of the musculoskeletal lesions. Although the open
incisional biopsy traditionally has been considered the gold standard with high diagnostic accuracy, an alternative, the closed
needle biopsy (CNB), has been developed and widely used as it can be performed at an outpatient clinic under local anesthesia
or in combination with the image guidance. In the present study, the authors purpose to study the diagnostic accuracy of CNB
without real-time image-guidance at an outpatient clinic by comparing it with open incisional biopsy in musculoskeletal
sarcoma patients.
Material and Method: The authors retrospectively reviewed 200 biopsy cases of sarcoma patients since 2002-2011. There
were 105 cases of open incisional biopsy 105 cases and 95 cases of CNB. The diagnostic accuracies of both mentioned
methods were compared statistically in four aspects of histopathology: nature (benign or malignant), specific diagnosis,
histological type and histological grade. The gold standard was a final pathological diagnosis of the resected specimens
received from definite surgery correlated with clinical findings and imaging studies.
Results : The diagnostic accuracies of open incisional biopsy were 97.14% for nature, 89.52% for specific diagnosis, 89.52%
for histological type, 88.57% for histological grade and the diagnostic accuracies of CNB were 96.84%, 89.47%, 88.42%,
86.32%, respectively. There was no significant statistical difference between the two methods in all histological aspects (p-
value >0.05). The diagnostic yields of both methods were 98.13% for open incisional biopsy, 97.94% for CNB and there was
no significant statistical difference (p-value >0.05). There were 6 cases (3%) for overall major errors, 3 cases (2.86%) from
open incisional biopsy and 3 cases (3.16%) from CNB. There were 18 cases (9%) for minor errors, 9 cases (8.57%) from
open incisional biopsy and 9 cases (9.47%) from CNB. There was no biopsy related complication in either method.
Conclusion : The office-based CNB diagnosis of musculoskeletal sarcoma can achieve an acceptably high diagnostic accuracy
rate compared with open incisional biopsy.
Keywords : Close needle biopsy, Musculoskeletal sarcoma, Diagnostic accuracy
JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION OF THAILAND
4th Floor, Royal Golden Jubilee Building,
2 Soi Soonvijai, New Petchburi road,
Bangkok 10310, Thailand.
Phone: 0-2716-6102, 0-2716-6962
Fax: 0-2314-6305
Email: editor@jmatonline.com
» Online Submissions » Author Guidelines » Copyright Notice » Privacy Statement
» Journal Sponsorship » Site Map » About this Publishing System
© MEDICAL ASSOCIATION OF THAILAND. All Rights Reserved. The content of this site is intended for health professionals.