Japarath Prechapanich MD*, Wiboolphan Thitadilok MD*
Affiliation : * Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University
Objectives : 1. To compare the accuracy of clinical and sonographic estimations of fetal weight in pregnant women.
2. To determine the contributing factors that may affect the accuracy of these two methods.
Study
Design : Prospective study.
Materials and Methods : 297 pregnant women who were admitted at labor room, Siriraj Hospital during the
period of January 6 to February 26, 2004 were enrolled. The fetal weight was estimated clinically by the
physicians, then blindly followed by sonographic estimation within 24 hours before delivery. The mean
absolute error was calculated from the absolute of the difference between the estimated fetal weight and the
actual birth weight of each method. Main outcome measurements were simple error, absolute error, absolute
percentage error, and accuracy within 10% of actual birth weight.
Results : The accuracy of clinical estimation of fetal weight was similar to sonographic estimation. The
accuracy within 10% of both methods were 66.7 (95%CI 61.3, 72.0) and 65.3 (95%CI 60.1, 71.0), respectively.
The estimation by both methods tend to be underestimated with the mean of absolute error 264.7 + 299.6 and
265.0 + 236.3 grams,respectively, and the mean of percentage error 9.0 + 9.7 and 8.6 + 6.9 % of actual birth
weight. The accuracy amongst possible contributing factors were compared and analyzed. The only one
factor effect the accuracy significantly was actual birth weight < 2,500 grams in clinical estimation
(P < 0.05). Sensitivity and specificity for prediction of birth weight lower than 2,500 grams was 82.6, 94.2%
by clinical and 64.4, 97.6% by sonographic estimation. The positive predictive value and negative predictive
value of both methods were 54.3, 98.5% and 82.9, 93.9%, respectively, while the efficacy was 93.3 and 92.6%.
Conclusions : Intrapartum clinical estimation of fetal weight was accurate as sonographic estimation, while
the mean of error in grams or in percentage of birth weight were indifferent. The low-birth weight influenced
the accuracy of clinical estimation significantly. However, clinical estimation is good enough for screening
of the low-birth weight because of its high sensitivity and negative predictive value.
Keywords : Estimated fetal weight,Clinical estimation of fetal weight, Sonographic estimation of fetal weight.
JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION OF THAILAND
4th Floor, Royal Golden Jubilee Building,
2 Soi Soonvijai, New Petchburi road,
Bangkok 10310, Thailand.
Phone: 0-2716-6102, 0-2716-6962
Fax: 0-2314-6305
Email: editor@jmatonline.com
» Online Submissions » Author Guidelines » Copyright Notice » Privacy Statement
» Journal Sponsorship » Site Map » About this Publishing System
© MEDICAL ASSOCIATION OF THAILAND. All Rights Reserved. The content of this site is intended for health professionals.