Wilaiwan Chongruksut MNS*, Bannakij Lojanapiwat MD**, Chamaiporn Tawichasri MSc*, Somboon Paichitvichean MD****, Jantima Euathrongchit MD***, Vorvat Choomsai Na Ayudhya MD**, Jayanton Patumanond MD, DSc*
Affiliation : * Clinical Epidemiology & Medical Statistics Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand ** Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand *** Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand **** Department of Surgery, Nakornping Hospital, Chiang Mai, Thailand
Background : Stone recurrence after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) or percutaneous nephrolithotomy
(PCNL) are common. Predictors for kidney stones vary among populations and areas.
Objective : To determine predictors for kidney stones recurrence after ESWL or PCNL.
Material and Method: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a university hospital. The study cohort was patients
aged more than 18 years, diagnosed with kidney stones, who were treated with ESWL or PCNL between 2006 and 2009.
Medical files were reviewed for clinical profiles, stone characteristics, composition, type of treatment, presence of stone
after treatment, stone reappearance, and related laboratory data. Predictors were determined by a multivariable poisson
regression and presented as incidence rate ratios (IRRs) with 95% confidence interval.
Results : From a cohort of 252 patients, 240 who had at least one follow-up and with complete plain kidney ureters and
bladder (KUB) film or intravenous pyelogram (IVP) were included in analysis. At three years, the total incidence rate of
recurrence was 46 per 1,000 person-months. After a multivariable poisson regression clustering by type of stone composition,
independent predictors for stone recurrence were age < 50 years (adjusted IRR = 1.3, 95% CI = 1.2-1.4, p < 0.001), ESWL
treatment (adjusted IRR = 2.1, 95% CI = 2.1-2.2, p < 0.001), stones located in lower calyx as compared to renal pelvis
(adjusted IRR = 8.7, 95% CI = 2.9-25.9, p = 0.001), multiple stones (adjusted IRR = 5.9, 95% CI = 4.8-7.5, p < 0.001), and
stone size larger than 20 mm (adjusted IRR = 1.4, 95% CI = 1.2-1.6, p < 0.001).
Conclusion : After stone removals, patients with these predictors should closely be followed up for regular clinical evaluations.
Keywords : Predictors, Kidney stones, Post treatment, Reformation, Incidence rate, Nephrolithotomy
JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION OF THAILAND
4th Floor, Royal Golden Jubilee Building,
2 Soi Soonvijai, New Petchburi road,
Bangkok 10310, Thailand.
Phone: 0-2716-6102, 0-2716-6962
Fax: 0-2314-6305
Email: editor@jmatonline.com
» Online Submissions » Author Guidelines » Copyright Notice » Privacy Statement
» Journal Sponsorship » Site Map » About this Publishing System
© MEDICAL ASSOCIATION OF THAILAND. All Rights Reserved. The content of this site is intended for health professionals.