Combined Clinical Risk Indices with Quantitative Ultrasound Calcaneus Measurement for Identifying Osteoporosis in Thai Postmenopausal Women
Chatlert Pongchaiyakul MD*, Suthee Panichkul MD, MSc**, Thawee Songpatanasilp MD***
Affiliation : * Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen ** Department of Military Community Medicine, Phramongkutklao College of Medicine, Phramongkutklao Hospital, Bangkok *** Department of Orthopaedic, Phramongkutklao College of Medicine, Phramongkutklao Hospital, Bangkok
Objective : To examine the diagnostic performance of clinical risk indices combined with quantitative ultra-
sound calcaneus measurement (QUS) for identifying osteoporosis in Thai postmenopausal women.
Materials and Methods : The present study was designed as a cross-sectional investigation in 300 Thai women,
aged between 38 and 85 years (mean age: 58). Femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by
DXA (Hologic QDR-4500; Hologic, Bedford, MA, USA). A BMD T-scores < -2.5 was defined as “osteoporosis”;
otherwise, “non-osteoporosis”. QUS was measured by Achilles+ (GE Lunar, Madison, WI, USA) and con-
verted to T-score. The OSTA and KKOS score was calculated for each woman using her age and weight Women
with OSTA/KKOS scores < -1 and > -1 were classified as “high risk” and “low risk”, respectively.
Results : Using DXA as the gold standard, the sensitivity of QUS to identify osteoporosis was lower than the
sensitivity of OSTA/KKOS (60 vs. 71/74%) but the specificity and PPV of QUS were higher than OSTA/KKOS.
The sensitivity increased when using OSTA/KKOS combined with QUS to identify osteoporosis (~87-89%)
while the specificity, PPV and NPV were comparable with using clinical risk indices alone. The risk (odds
ratio; OR) of osteoporosis when QUS T-score < -2.5 alone was 9.94 (95%CI: 4.74-20.87), which was higher
than high risk by OSTA/KKOS alone (OR: 6.35, 95%CI: 2.99-13.47 for OSTA and 8.15, 95%CI: 3.76-17.66 for
KKOS). Furthermore, individuals were classified “high risk” from OSTA/KKOS with QUS T-score < -2.5SD,
the risk of osteoporosis was increased (OR: 43.68, 95%CI: 13.89-137.36 and OR: 60.92, 95%CI: 17.69-
209.76 for OSTA and KKOS, respectively).
Conclusion : Using the clinical risk indices combined with QUS could improve the accuracy of osteoporosis
identification. This approach could be used in a primary care setting or community-based hospital where a
DXA machine is not available.
Keywords : Bone mineral density, Clinical risk index, Epidemiology, Osteoporosis, Quantitative ultrasound measurement
